Skip to content

MED 0001201549.  This website is for adult viewing (18+).  Please take time to read and understand the potential risks of surgery.

01Article · Labiaplasty B&A

Before-and-afters —
and their limits.

Photographs of surgical results are useful, but they are not promises. A before-and-after image is a record of two moments in one patient's healing journey — taken from a particular angle, at a particular timepoint, against a particular starting anatomy. This article walks through what our labiaplasty before and after gallery genuinely shows, what it does not, and what to ask at consultation that a still image cannot answer.

Written by Dr Kishen Nara · Reviewed for plain-language accuracy · Published 4 August 2026

02In short

A before-and-after photograph shows the change in position and length of the labia minora for one patient at one healing timepoint. It does not show comfort, sensation, satisfaction, or the long-term scar appearance. The honest way to read any gallery is to check the timepoint, accept that asymmetry will remain, and ask the practitioner what would be reasonable for your particular anatomy at consultation.

03What an honest gallery shows

Five things —
that are genuinely visible.

These are the elements a still image can reasonably represent, if it has been taken under consistent conditions and labelled with the healing timepoint.

  • 01The position and length of the labia minora before the procedure, against the position and length at a documented healing timepoint.
  • 02Whether asymmetry has been addressed — the labia are almost never perfectly symmetrical before, and they are not made identical after either.
  • 03The position of the surgical scar — its planned location along the labial edge or trim line, photographed at a stage where it is still settling.
  • 04Skin texture and colour change in the immediate area, against the same anatomy from a similar viewpoint pre-operatively.
  • 05An honest representation of healing time — a six-week photograph looks meaningfully different from a six-month photograph, and the practice should disclose which one you are looking at.

04What an honest gallery cannot show

Five things —
a still image cannot prove.

These are the elements you cannot evaluate from a photograph. They belong to the lived experience of the patient and the conversation at consultation.

  • 01How comfortable a patient feels during exercise, intercourse, or in clothing — comfort is the lived experience and a still image cannot represent it.
  • 02How much of the change came from the surgical work versus the resolution of swelling, bruising, and early scar redness over the months that follow.
  • 03What a similar result would look like on your anatomy — labial tissue varies considerably, and the only way to assess your particular anatomy is in person at consultation.
  • 04Whether the result is permanent — labial tissue continues to change with age, hormonal shifts, and life events, and we say that openly rather than implying otherwise.
  • 05Whether the patient is happy — patient satisfaction is a separate question that we do not address through testimonials about clinical care, in line with the AHPRA advertising guidelines.

05How to read a gallery honestly

Five practical —
reading habits.

These habits help you compare galleries across different clinics on the same basis, rather than being drawn to whichever has the most dramatic-looking pairings.

  • 01Read the timepoint first — six weeks, three months, six months, twelve months. Healing changes the image more than most patients expect.
  • 02Read whether the photograph is taken from the same viewpoint as the pre-operative one — lighting, distance and angle alter perception significantly.
  • 03Look at the scar position, not the scar visibility — visibility settles over months; position is fixed by the technique on the day of the operation.
  • 04Notice asymmetry that has not been removed — the absence of perfect symmetry is realistic, not a defect.
  • 05Resist the temptation to compare to your own anatomy — the patient in the photograph is not you, and a similar starting point can have a different result based on tissue, healing and intention.

06What our gallery photographs reflect

SAP labiaplasty —
technique-specific results.

Dr Nara's labiaplasty practice uses the Sensation-Aware Pedicle (SAP) technique. The technique informs what you see in the photographs — the planned trim line, the preserved pigmented edge, the deliberate decision not to remove all asymmetry. Galleries from practices that use a different technique are showing a different surgical philosophy, and the photographs are not directly comparable.

  • 01Preserves the natural pigmented edge of the labia minora wherever possible, rather than removing it entirely — sensation along the edge is often a patient priority.
  • 02Tailors the trim line to the patient's own anatomy and goals, discussed in detail at the second consultation with anatomical drawings and photographs.
  • 03Documents the planned line on the day of the operation, against the patient's stated goals, before any incision.
  • 04Sets realistic expectations about asymmetry — the body is rarely symmetrical and the surgical plan accepts that rather than promising to remove it.

The detail of the technique is described in the companion piece labiaplasty in Melbourne — beyond labia reduction, and the pillar overview is on the labiaplasty page.

07Why our gallery is restrained

Regulator rules —
that shape what we show.

The Medical Board of Australia and AHPRA publish guidelines that govern how cosmetic surgery before-and-after photographs may be presented. The relevant constraints include not using imagery in a way that misleads about the likely outcome, not creating an unrealistic expectation, and not including testimonials about clinical care. We follow these rules deliberately. A more restrained gallery is not a weaker gallery — it is one that reflects what photographs can and cannot honestly do.

The full guideline document is published by the Medical Board of Australia and the AHPRA register lets you verify the credentials of any operating doctor in Australia.

08The conversation at consultation

What the photographs —
cannot answer for you.

A consultation is where the photographs become useful as a conversation tool rather than a marketing tool. Dr Nara reviews your anatomy in person, talks through what is and is not reasonable for your particular starting point, draws the proposed trim line where you can see it, and answers questions about scar position, asymmetry, and what the result is likely to look like at six weeks and at six months. None of this is decided from a photograph.

Take your time, ask questions, and seek a second opinion before you commit to anything. The Medical Board of Australia framework requires at least two consultations with at least one face-to-face, and a seven-day cooling-off period — these are designed exactly for the kind of decision you are weighing here.

09Where consultations happen

Three states —
one accredited hospital.

Dr Nara consults at Chadstone in Melbourne (Victoria), Cooee in Tasmania, and Stepney in South Australia. Labiaplasty itself takes place at our accredited Melbourne hospital. More on each location is on the Melbourne, Tasmania and Adelaide pages.

10Frequently asked questions

Questions patients —
actually ask.

Why are some labiaplasty galleries online so dramatic-looking?

Two reasons. The first is that the photographs have sometimes been taken at very different timepoints — a swollen six-week post-operative photograph against a pre-operative photograph from a similar angle exaggerates the change. The second is that some clinics select only the most visually striking results for display. Neither approach gives you a representative view. A gallery worth trusting shows a range of starting anatomies, a range of healing timepoints, and is upfront about both.

Will my result look like the photographs?

Probably not exactly. Labial tissue varies in length, thickness, asymmetry, pigmentation and resilience. The result for any one patient depends on their starting anatomy, the surgical plan agreed at the second consultation, individual healing factors, and time. We can show you photographs of patients whose anatomy is broadly similar to yours, but no still image is a guarantee of a similar result.

What happens at six weeks versus six months?

At six weeks the area is still settling — swelling is improving but not fully resolved, the scar is still pink and slightly raised, and sensation is still recovering. At six months most of the swelling has gone, the scar has begun to fade, and the position and length are closer to the long-term result. At twelve months the scar is generally pale and the tissue has settled. A photograph taken at six weeks and a photograph taken at twelve months look meaningfully different.

Why do you not include testimonials about how patients feel?

The current AHPRA advertising guidelines do not permit testimonials about clinical care — they do permit testimonials about non-clinical service experiences, but anything that describes how a patient felt about their surgical result is restricted. We comply with that framework. The honest version of patient satisfaction is best understood by speaking with Dr Nara at consultation, not from a curated quote on a marketing page.

Can I see more photographs at consultation than online?

Yes. Online galleries are deliberately a small, representative selection. At consultation, where it is clinically appropriate, Dr Nara can show further photographs to help you understand the range of healing patterns and the typical scar position for the technique he uses. These are not promises of a similar result for you, and we make that explicit.

Why do you note that results are not generalisable?

Because they are not. Two patients with similar starting anatomy can have meaningfully different results based on tissue, healing, compliance with after-care, and the slow process of scar maturation. The disclaimer is not a legal formality — it is the clinical reality. Outcomes vary significantly between patients depending on genetic composition, medical history and individual circumstances.

11How to begin

Next steps —
if you are considering.

The first step is a referral from your usual GP, followed by an in-person consultation with Dr Nara. At that consultation we can review your anatomy and discuss what the photographs can — and cannot — represent for your particular case. Take your time, ask questions, and seek a second opinion before you commit to anything.

You can begin a confidential enquiry at any time. RevAesthetic is located at Chadstone Shopping Centre, G 120A / 1341 Dandenong Rd, Chadstone VIC 3148.

12About the practitioner

Dr Kishen
Nara.

Dr Kishen Nara is a registered medical practitioner. He sees patients across Melbourne, Tasmania and Adelaide. The team at RevAesthetic includes practice manager Cate, Patient Liaison Jenny, and registered nurses, all involved in supporting your enquiry.

  • MBBSBachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery — Monash University
  • FACCSM(Surg)Surgical Fellow, Australasian College of Cosmetic Surgery and Medicine
  • AHPRARegistered medical practitioner — General Registration MED0001201549

Read more about us

13Continue reading

More from
the journal.

Disclaimer: All cosmetic procedures have inherent potential risks and complications. We encourage you to seek a second opinion from a qualified medical professional before any procedure. Material on this page is educational in nature and is not generalisable — outcomes vary significantly between patients depending on genetic composition, medical history and individual circumstances. Dr Kishen Nara — MBBS, FACCSM(Surg), AHPRA Registration MED0001201549. General Registration.

07 — Begin

Begin a conversation.

Contact us for more information, or to request a consultation.